The
American Scholar
by Ralph Waldo Emerson
1837
Phi Beta Kappa Address
Mr.
President and Gentlemen,
I
greet you on the re-commencement of our literary year. Our anniversary is one of
hope, and, perhaps, not enough of labor. We do not meet for games of strength or
skill, for the recitation of histories, tragedies, and odes, like the ancient
Greeks; for parliaments of love and poesy, like the Troubadours; nor for the
advancement of science, like our contemporaries in the British and European
capitals. Thus far, our holiday has been simply a friendly sign of the survival
of the love of letters amongst a people too busy to give to letters any more. As
such, it is precious as the sign of an indestructible instinct. Perhaps the time
is already come, when it ought to be, and will be, something else; when the
sluggard intellect of this continent will look from under its iron lids, and
fill the postponed expectation of the world with something better than the
exertions of mechanical skill. Our day of dependence, our long apprenticeship to
the learning of other lands, draws to a close.
The
millions, that around us are rushing into life, cannot always be fed on the sere
remains of foreign harvests. Events, actions arise, that must be sung, that will
sing themselves. Who can doubt, that poetry will revive and lead in a new age,
as the star in the constellation Harp, which now flames in our zenith,
astronomers announce, shall one day be the pole-star for a thousand years?
In
this hope, I accept the topic which not only usage, but the nature of our
association, seem to prescribe to this day, -- the AMERICAN SCHOLAR. Year by
year, we come up hither to read one more chapter of his biography. Let us
inquire what light new days and events have thrown on his character, and his
hopes.
It
is one of those fables, which, out of an unknown antiquity, convey an
unlooked-for wisdom, that the gods, in the beginning, divided Man into men, that
he might be more helpful to himself; just as the hand was divided into fingers,
the better to answer its end.
The
old fable covers a doctrine ever new and sublime; that there is One Man, --
present to all particular men only partially, or through one faculty; and that
you must take the whole society to find the whole man. Man is not a farmer, or a
professor, or an engineer, but he is all. Man is priest, and scholar, and
statesman, and producer, and soldier. In the divided or social state, these
functions are parceled out to individuals, each of whom aims to do his stint of
the joint work, whilst each other performs his. The fable implies, that the
individual, to possess himself, must sometimes return from his own labor to
embrace all the other laborers. But unfortunately, this original unit, this
fountain of power, has been so distributed to multitudes, has been so minutely
subdivided and peddled out, that it is spilled into drops, and cannot be
gathered. The state of society is one in which the members have suffered
amputation from the trunk, and strut about so many walking monsters, -- a good
finger, a neck, a stomach, an elbow, but never a man.
Man
is thus metamorphosed into a thing, into many things. The planter, who is Man
sent out into the field to gather food, is seldom cheered by any idea of the
true dignity of his ministry. He sees his bushel and his cart, and nothing
beyond, and sinks into the farmer, instead of Man on the farm. The tradesman
scarcely ever gives an ideal worth to his work, but is ridden by the routine of
his craft, and the soul is subject to dollars. The priest becomes a form; the
attorney, a statute-book; the mechanic, a machine; the sailor, a rope of a ship.
In
this distribution of functions, the scholar is the delegated intellect. In the
right state, he is, Man Thinking. In the degenerate state, when the victim of
society, he tends to become a mere thinker, or, still worse, the parrot of other
men’s thinking.
In
this view of him, as Man Thinking, the theory of his office is contained. Him
nature solicits with all her placid, all her monitory pictures; him the past
instructs; him the future invites.
Is
not, indeed, every man a student, and do not all things exist for the
student’s behoof? And, finally, is not the true scholar the only true master? But
the old oracle said, ‘All things have two handles: beware of the wrong one.’
In life, too often, the scholar errs with mankind and forfeits his privilege.
Let us see him in his school, and consider him in reference to the main
influences he receives.
I.
The first in time and the first in importance of the influences upon the
mind is that of nature. Every day, the sun; and, after sunset, night and her
stars. Ever the winds blow; ever the grass grows. Every day, men and women,
conversing, beholding and beholden. The scholar is he of all men whom this
spectacle most engages. He must settle its value in his mind. What is nature to
him? There is never a beginning, there is never an end, to the inexplicable
continuity of this web of God, but always circular power returning into itself.
Therein it resembles his own spirit, whose beginning, whose ending, he never can
find, -- so entire, so boundless. Far, too, as her splendors shine, system on
system shooting like rays, upward, downward, without centre, without
circumference, -- in the mass and in the particle, nature hastens to render
account of herself to the mind. Classification begins. To the young mind, every
thing is individual, stands by itself. By and by, it finds how to join two
things, and see in them one nature; then three, then three thousand; and so,
tyrannized over by its own unifying instinct, it goes on tying things together,
diminishing anomalies, discovering roots running under ground, whereby contrary
and remote things cohere, and flower out from one stem. It presently learns,
that, since the dawn of history, there has been a constant accumulation and
classifying of facts. But what is classification but the perceiving that these
objects are not chaotic, and are not foreign, but have a law which is also a law
of the human mind? The astronomer discovers that geometry, a pure abstraction of
the human mind, is the measure of planetary motion. The chemist finds
proportions and intelligible method throughout matter; and science is nothing
but the finding of analogy, identity, in the most remote parts. The ambitious
soul sits down before each refractory fact; one after another, reduces all
strange constitutions, all new powers, to their class and their law, and goes on
for ever to animate the last fibre of organization, the outskirts of nature, by
insight. Thus to him, to this
school-boy under the bending dome of day, is suggested, that he and it proceed
from one root; one is leaf and one is flower; relation, sympathy, stirring in
every vein. And what is that Root? Is not that the soul of his soul? -- A
thought too bold, -- a dream too wild. Yet when this spiritual light shall have
revealed the law of more earthly natures, -- when he has learned to worship the
soul, and to see that the natural philosophy that now is, is only the first
gropings of its gigantic hand, he shall look forward to an ever expanding
knowledge as to a becoming creator. He shall see, that nature is the opposite of
the soul, answering to it part for part. One is seal, and one is print. Its
beauty is the beauty of his own mind. Its laws are the laws of his own mind.
Nature then becomes to him the measure of his attainments. So much of nature as
he is ignorant of, so much of his own mind does he not yet possess. And, in
fine, the ancient precept, “Know thyself,” and the modern precept, “Study
nature,” become at last one maxim.
II.
The next great influence into the spirit of the scholar, is, the mind of
the Past, -- in whatever form, whether of literature, of art, of institutions,
that mind is inscribed. Books are the best type of the influence of the past,
and perhaps we shall get at the truth, -- learn the amount of this influence
more conveniently, -- by considering their value alone. The
theory of books is noble. The scholar of the first age received into him the
world around; brooded thereon; gave it the new arrangement of his own mind, and
uttered it again. It came into him, life; it went out from him, truth. It came
to him, short-lived actions; it went out from him, immortal thoughts. It came to
him, business; it went from him, poetry. It was dead fact; now, it is quick
thought. It can stand, and it can go. It now endures, it now flies, it now
inspires. Precisely in proportion to the depth of mind from which it issued, so
high does it soar, so long does it sing. Or,
I might say, it depends on how far the process had gone, of transmuting life
into truth. In proportion to the completeness of the distillation, so will the
purity and imperishableness of the product be. But none is quite perfect. As no
air-pump can by any means make a perfect vacuum, so neither can any artist
entirely exclude the conventional, the local, the perishable from his book, or
write a book of pure thought, that shall be as efficient, in all respects, to a
remote posterity, as to contemporaries, or rather to the second age. Each age,
it is found, must write its own books; or rather, each generation for the next
succeeding. The books of an older period will not fit this.
Yet
hence arises a grave mischief. The sacredness which attaches to the act of
creation, -- the act of thought, -- is transferred to the record. The poet
chanting, was felt to be a divine man: henceforth the chant is divine also. The
writer was a just and wise spirit: henceforward it is settled, the book is
perfect; as love of the hero corrupts into worship of his statue. Instantly, the
book becomes noxious: the guide is a tyrant. The sluggish and perverted mind of
the multitude, slow to open to the incursions of Reason, having once so opened,
having once received this book, stands upon it, and makes an outcry, if it is
disparaged. Colleges are built on it. Books are written on it by thinkers, not
by Man Thinking; by men of talent, that is, who start wrong, who set out from
accepted dogmas, not from their own sight of principles. Meek young men grow up
in libraries, believing it their duty to accept the views, which Cicero, which
Locke, which Bacon, have given, forgetful that Cicero, Locke, and Bacon were
only young men in libraries, when they wrote these books.
Hence,
instead of Man Thinking, we have the bookworm. Hence, the book-learned class,
who value books, as such; not as related to nature and the human constitution,
but as making a sort of Third Estate with the world and the soul. Hence, the
restorers of readings, the emendators, the bibliomaniacs of all degrees.
Books
are the best of things, well used; abused, among the worst. What is the right
use? What is the one end, which all means go to effect? They are for nothing but
to inspire. I had better never see a book, than to be warped by its attraction
clean out of my own orbit, and made a satellite instead of a system. The one
thing in the world, of value, is the active soul. This every man is entitled to;
this every man contains within him, although, in almost all men, obstructed, and
as yet unborn. The soul active sees absolute truth; and utters truth, or
creates. In this action, it is genius; not the privilege of here and there a
favorite, but the sound estate of every man. In its essence, it is progressive.
The book, the college, the school of art, the institution of any kind, stop with
some past utterance of genius. This is good, say they, -- let us hold by this.
They pin me down. They look backward and not forward. But genius looks forward:
the eyes of man are set in his forehead, not in his hindhead: man hopes: genius
creates. Whatever talents may be, if the man create not, the pure efflux of the
Deity is not his; -- cinders and smoke there may be, but not yet flame. There
are creative manners, there are creative actions, and creative words; manners,
actions, words, that is, indicative of no custom or authority, but springing
spontaneous from the mind’s own sense of good and fair.
On
the other part, instead of being its own seer, let it receive from another mind
its truth, though it were in torrents of light, without periods of solitude,
inquest, and self-recovery, and a fatal disservice is done. Genius is always
sufficiently the enemy of genius by over influence. The literature of every
nation bear me witness. The English dramatic poets have Shakspearized now for
two hundred years.
Undoubtedly
there is a right way of reading, so it be sternly subordinated. Man
Thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s
idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted
in other men’s transcripts of their readings. But when the intervals of
darkness come, as come they must, -- when the sun is hid, and the stars withdraw
their shining, -- we repair to the lamps which were kindled by their ray, to
guide our steps to the East again, where the dawn is. We hear, that we may
speak. The Arabian proverb says, “A fig tree, looking on a fig tree, becometh
fruitful.”
It
is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books.
They
impress us with the conviction, that one nature wrote and the same reads. We
read the verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of
Dryden, with the most modern joy, -- with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great
part caused by the abstraction of all time from their verses. There is some awe
mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this poet, who lived in some past
world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies close to my own
soul, that which I also had wellnigh thought and said. But for the evidence
thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some preestablished harmony, some foresight of souls that were to
be, and some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact
observed in insects, who lay up food before death for the young grub they shall
never see.
I
would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all know, that, as the human body can be nourished on any
food, though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can
be fed by any knowledge. And great and heroic men have existed, who had almost
no other information than by the printed page. I only would say, that it needs a
strong head to bear that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the
proverb says, “He that would bring home the wealth of the Indies, must carry
out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then creative reading as well as
creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and invention, the page of
whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion. Every sentence is
doubly significant, and the sense of our author is as broad as the world. We
then see, what is always true, that, as the seer’s hour of vision is short and
rare among heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of
his volume. The discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that
least part, -- only the authentic utterances of the oracle; -- all the rest he
rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and Shakespeare’s.
Of
course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History
and exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner,
have their indispensable office, -- to teach elements. But they can only highly
serve us, when they aim not to drill, but to create; when they gather from far
every ray of various genius to their hospitable halls, and, by the concentrated
fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame. Thought and knowledge are natures
in which apparatus and pretension avail nothing. Gowns, and pecuniary
foundations, though of towns of gold, can never countervail the least sentence
or syllable of wit. Forget this, and our American colleges will recede in their
public importance, whilst they grow richer every year.
III.
There goes in the world a notion, that the scholar should be a recluse, a
valetudinarian, -- as unfit for any handiwork or public labor, as a penknife for
an axe. The so-called ‘practical men’ sneer at speculative men, as if,
because they speculate or see, they could do nothing. I have heard it said that
the clergy, -- who are always, more universally than any other class, the
scholars of their day, -- are addressed as women; that the rough, spontaneous
conversation of men they do not hear, but only a mincing and diluted speech. They
are often virtually disfranchised; and, indeed, there are advocates for their
celibacy. As far as this is true of the studious classes, it is not just and
wise. Action is with the scholar subordinate, but it is essential. Without it,
he is not yet man. Without it, thought can never ripen into truth. Whilst the
world hangs before the eye as a cloud of beauty, we cannot even see its beauty.
Inaction is cowardice, but there can be no scholar without the heroic mind. The
preamble of thought, the transition through which it passes from the unconscious
to the conscious, is action. Only so much do I know, as I have lived. Instantly
we know whose words are loaded with life, and whose not. The
world, -- this shadow of the soul, or other me, lies wide around. Its
attractions are the keys which unlock my thoughts and make me acquainted with
myself. I run eagerly into this resounding tumult. I grasp the hands of those
next me, and take my place in the ring to suffer and to work, taught by an
instinct, that so shall the dumb abyss be vocal with speech. I pierce its order;
I dissipate its fear; I dispose of it within the circuit of my expanding life.
So much only of life as I know by experience, so much of the wilderness have I
vanquished and planted, or so far have I extended my being, my dominion. I do
not see how any man can afford, for the sake of his nerves and his nap, to spare
any action in which he can partake. It is pearls and rubies to his discourse.
Drudgery, calamity, exasperation, want, are instructors in eloquence and wisdom.
The true scholar grudges every opportunity of action past by, as a loss of
power. It is the raw material out
of which the intellect moulds her splendid products. A strange process too,
this, by which experience is converted into thought, as a mulberry leaf is
converted into satin. The manufacture goes forward at all hours.
The
actions and events of our childhood and youth, are now matters of calmest
observation. They lie like fair pictures in the air. Not so with our recent
actions, -- with the business which we now have in hand. On this we are quite
unable to speculate. Our affections as yet circulate through it. We no more feel
or know it, than we feel the feet, or the hand, or the brain of our body. The
new deed is yet a part of life, -- remains for a time immersed in our
unconscious life. In some contemplative hour, it detaches itself from the life
like a ripe fruit, to become a thought of the mind. Instantly, it is raised,
transfigured; the corruptible has put on incorruption. Henceforth it is an
object of beauty, however base its origin and neighborhood. Observe, too, the
impossibility of antedating this act. In its grub state, it cannot fly, it
cannot shine, it is a dull grub. But suddenly, without observation, the selfsame
thing unfurls beautiful wings, and is an angel of wisdom. So
is there no fact, no event, in our private history, which shall not, sooner or
later, lose its adhesive, inert form, and astonish us by soaring from our body
into the empyrean. Cradle and infancy, school and playground, the fear of boys,
and dogs, and ferules, the love of little maids and berries, and many another
fact that once filled the whole sky, are gone already; friend and relative
profession and party, town and country, nation and world, must also soar and
sing.
Of
course, he who has put forth his total strength in fit actions, has the richest
return of wisdom. I will not shut myself out of this globe of action, and
transplant an oak into a flower-pot, there to hunger and pine; nor trust the
revenue of some single faculty, and exhaust one vein of thought, much like those
Savoyards, who, getting their livelihood by carving shepherds, shepherdesses,
and smoking Dutchmen, for all Europe, went out one day to the mountain to find
stock, and discovered that they had whittled up the last of their pine-trees.
Authors we have, in numbers, who have written out their vein, and who, moved by
a commendable prudence, sail for Greece or Palestine, follow the trapper into
the prairie, or ramble round Algiers, to replenish their merchantable stock. If
it were only for a vocabulary, the scholar would be covetous of action. Life is
our dictionary. Years are well spent in country labors; in town, -- in the
insight into trades and manufactures; in frank intercourse with many men and
women; in science; in art; to the one end of mastering in all their facts a
language by which to illustrate and embody our perceptions. I learn immediately
from any speaker how much he has already lived, through the poverty or the
splendor of his speech. Life lies behind us as the quarry from whence we get
tiles and copestones for the masonry of to-day. This is the way to learn
grammar. Colleges and books only copy the language which the field and the
work-yard made. But the final value
of action, like that of books, and better than books, is, that it is a resource.
That great principle of Undulation in nature, that shows itself in the inspiring
and expiring of the breath; in desire and satiety; in the ebb and flow of the
sea; in day and night; in heat and cold; and as yet more deeply ingrained in
every atom and every fluid, is known to us under the name of Polarity, -- these
“fits of easy transmission and reflection,” as Newton called them, are the
law of nature because they are the law of spirit.
The
mind now thinks; now acts; and each fit reproduces the other. When the artist
has exhausted his materials, when the fancy no longer paints, when thoughts are
no longer apprehended, and books are a weariness, -- he has always the resource
to live. Character is higher than intellect. Thinking is the function. Living is
the functionary. The stream retreats to its source. A great soul will be strong
to live, as well as strong to think. Does he lack organ or medium to impart his
truths? He can still fall back on this elemental force of living them. This is a
total act. Thinking is a partial act. Let the grandeur of justice shine in his
affairs. Let the beauty of affection cheer his lowly roof. Those ‘far from
fame,’ who dwell and act with him, will feel the force of his constitution in
the doings and passages of the day better than it can be measured by any public
and designed display. Time shall teach him, that the scholar loses no hour which
the man lives. Herein he unfolds the sacred germ of his instinct, screened from
influence. What is lost in seemliness is gained in strength. Not out of those,
on whom systems of education have exhausted their culture, comes the helpful
giant to destroy the old or to build the new, but out of unhandselled savage
nature, out of terrible Druids and Berserkirs, come at last Alfred and
Shakespeare. I hear therefore with
joy whatever is beginning to be said of the dignity and necessity of labor to
every citizen. There is virtue yet in the hoe and the spade, for learned as well
as for unlearned hands. And labor is everywhere welcome; always we are invited
to work; only be this limitation observed, that a man shall not for the sake of
wider activity sacrifice any opinion to the popular judgments and modes of
action.
I
have now spoken of the education of the scholar by nature, by books, and by
action. It remains to say somewhat of his duties. They are such as become Man
Thinking. They may all be comprised in self-trust. The office of the scholar is
to cheer, to raise, and to guide men by showing them facts amidst appearances.
He plies the slow, unhonored, and unpaid task of observation. Flamsteed and Herschel, in their glazed observatories, may
catalogue the stars with the praise of all men, and, the results being splendid
and useful, honor is sure. But he, in his private observatory, cataloguing
obscure and nebulous stars of the human mind, which as yet no man has thought of
as such, -- watching days and months, sometimes, for a few facts; correcting
still his old records; -- must relinquish display and immediate fame. In the
long period of his preparation, he must betray often an ignorance and
shiftlessness in popular arts, incurring the disdain of the able who shoulder
him aside. Long he must stammer in his speech; often forego the living for the
dead. Worse yet, he must accept, -- how often! poverty and solitude. For the
ease and pleasure of treading the old road, accepting the fashions, the
education, the religion of society, he takes the cross of making his own, and,
of course, the self-accusation, the faint heart, the frequent uncertainty and
loss of time, which are the nettles and tangling vines in the way of the
self-relying and self-directed; and the state of virtual hostility in which he
seems to stand to society, and especially to educated society. For all this loss
and scorn, what offset? He is to find consolation in exercising the highest
functions of human nature. He is one, who raises himself from private
considerations, and breathes and lives on public and illustrious thoughts. He is
the world’s eye. He is the
world’s heart. He is to resist the vulgar prosperity that retrogrades ever to
barbarism, by preserving and communicating heroic sentiments, noble biographies,
melodious verse, and the conclusions of history. Whatsoever oracles the human
heart, in all emergencies, in all solemn hours, has uttered as its commentary on
the world of actions, -- these he shall receive and impart. And whatsoever new
verdict Reason from her inviolable seat pronounces on the passing men and events
of to-day, -- this he shall hear and promulgate.
These
being his functions, it becomes him to feel all confidence in himself, and to
defer never to the popular cry. He and he only knows the world. The world of any
moment is the merest appearance. Some great decorum, some fetish of a
government, some ephemeral trade, or war, or man, is cried up by half mankind
and cried down by the other half, as if all depended on this particular up or
down. The odds are that the whole question is not worth the poorest thought
which the scholar has lost in listening to the controversy. Let
him not quit his belief that a popgun is a popgun, though the ancient and
honorable of the earth affirm it to be the crack of doom. In silence, in
steadiness, in severe abstraction, let him hold by himself; add observation to
observation, patient of neglect, patient of reproach; and bide his own time, --
happy enough, if he can satisfy himself alone, that this day he has seen
something truly. Success treads on every right step. For the instinct is sure,
that prompts him to tell his brother what he thinks. He then learns, that in
going down into the secrets of his own mind, he has descended into the secrets
of all minds. He learns that he who has mastered any law in his private
thoughts, is master to that extent of all men whose language he speaks, and of
all into whose language his own can be translated. The poet, in utter solitude
remembering his spontaneous thoughts and recording them, is found to have
recorded that, which men in crowded cities find true for them also. The orator
distrusts at first the fitness of his frank confessions, -- his want of
knowledge of the persons he addresses, -- until he finds that he is the
complement of his hearers; -- that they drink his words because he fulfill for
them their own nature; the deeper he dives into his privatest, secretest
presentiment, to his wonder he finds, this is the most acceptable, most public,
and universally true. The people delight in it; the better part of every man
feels, This is my music; this is myself. In self-trust, all the virtues are comprehended. Free should
the scholar be, -- free and brave. Free even to the definition of freedom,
“without any hindrance that does not arise out of his own constitution.”
Brave; for fear is a thing, which a scholar by his very function puts behind
him. Fear always springs from ignorance. It is a shame to him if his
tranquility, amid dangerous times, arise from the presumption, that, like
children and women, his is a protected class; or if he seek a temporary peace by
the diversion of his thoughts from politics or vexed questions, hiding his head
like an ostrich in the flowering bushes, peeping into microscopes, and turning
rhymes, as a boy whistles to keep his courage up. So is the danger a danger
still; so is the fear worse. Manlike let him turn and face it. Let him look into
its eye and search its nature, inspect its origin, -- see the whelping of this
lion, -- which lies no great way back; he will then find in himself a perfect
comprehension of its nature and extent; he will have made his hands meet on the
other side, and can henceforth defy it, and pass on superior. The world is his,
who can see through its pretension. What deafness, what stone-blind custom, what
overgrown error you behold, is there only by sufferance, -- by your sufferance.
See it to be a lie, and you have already dealt it its mortal blow.
Yes,
we are the cowed, -- we the trustless. It is a mischievous notion that we are
come late into nature; that the world was finished a long time ago. As the world
was plastic and fluid in the hands of God, so it is ever to so much of his
attributes as we bring to it. To ignorance and sin, it is flint. They adapt
themselves to it as they may; but in proportion as a man has any thing in him
divine, the firmament flows before him and takes his signet and form. Not
he is great who can alter matter, but he who can alter my state of mind. They
are the kings of the world who give the color of their present thought to all
nature and all art, and persuade men by the cheerful serenity of their carrying
the matter, that this thing which they do, is the apple which the ages have
desired to pluck, now at last ripe, and inviting nations to the harvest. The
great man makes the great thing. Wherever Macdonald sits, there is the head of
the table. Linnaeus makes botany the most alluring of studies, and wins it from
the farmer and the herb-woman; Davy, chemistry; and Cuvier, fossils. The day is
always his, who works in it with serenity and great aims. The
unstable estimates of men crowd to him whose mind is filled with a truth, as the
heaped waves of the Atlantic follow the moon. For
this self-trust, the reason is deeper than can be fathomed, -- darker than can
be enlightened. I might not carry with me the feeling of my audience in stating
my own belief. But I have already shown the ground of my hope, in adverting to
the doctrine that man is one. I believe man has been wronged; he has wronged
himself. He has almost lost the light, that can lead him back to his
prerogatives. Men are become of no account. Men in history, men in the world of
to-day are bugs, are spawn, and are called ‘the mass’ and ‘the herd.’ In
a century, in a millennium, one or two men; that is to say, -- one or two
approximations to the right state of every man. All the rest behold in the hero
or the poet their own green and crude being, -- ripened; yes, and are content to
be less, so that may attain to its full stature. What a testimony, -- full of
grandeur, full of pity, is borne to the demands of his own nature, by the poor
clansman, the poor partisan, who rejoices in the glory of his chief. The poor
and the low find some amends to their immense moral capacity, for their
acquiescence in a political and social inferiority. They are content to be
brushed like flies from the path of a great person, so that justice shall be
done by him to that common nature which it is the dearest desire of all to see
enlarged and glorified. They sun themselves in the great man’s light, and feel
it to be their own element. They cast the dignity of man from their downtrod
selves upon the shoulders of a hero, and will perish to add one drop of blood to
make that great heart beat, those giant sinews combat and conquer. He lives for
us, and we live in him. Men such as
they are, very naturally seek money or power; and power because it is as good as
money, -- the “spoils,” so called, “of office.” And why not? for they
aspire to the highest, and this, in their sleep-walking, they dream is highest.
Wake them, and they shall quit the false good, and leap to the true, and leave
governments to clerks and desks. This revolution is to be wrought by the gradual
domestication of the idea of Culture. The main enterprise of the world for
splendor, for extent, is the upbuilding of a man. Here are the materials strown
along the ground. The private life of one man shall be a more illustrious
monarchy, -- more formidable to its enemy, more sweet and serene in its
influence to its friend, than any kingdom in history. For a man, rightly viewed,
comprehendeth the particular natures of all men. Each philosopher, each bard,
each actor, has only done for me, as by a delegate, what one day I can do for
myself. The books which once we valued more than the apple of the eye, we have
quite exhausted. What is that but saying, that we have come up with the point of
view which the universal mind took through the eyes of one scribe; we have been
that man, and have passed on. First, one; then, another; we drain all cisterns,
and, waxing greater by all these supplies, we crave a better and more abundant
food. The man has never lived that can feed us ever. The human mind cannot be
enshrined in a person, who shall set a barrier on any one side to this
unbounded, unboundable empire. It
is one central fire, which, flaming now out of the lips of Etna, lightens the
capes of Sicily; and, now out of the throat of Vesuvius, illuminates the towers
and vineyards of Naples. It is one light which beams out of a thousand stars. It
is one soul which animates all men. But
I have dwelt perhaps tediously upon this abstraction of the Scholar. I ought not
to delay longer to add what I have to say, of nearer reference to the time and
to this country.
Historically,
there is thought to be a difference in the ideas which predominate over
successive epochs, and there are data for marking the genius of the Classic, of
the Romantic, and now of the Reflective or Philosophical age. With the views I
have intimated of the oneness or the identity of the mind through all
individuals, I do not much dwell on these differences. In fact, I believe each
individual passes through all three. The boy is a Greek; the youth, romantic;
the adult, reflective. I deny not, however, that a revolution in the leading
idea may be distinctly enough traced. Our
age is bewailed as the age of Introversion. Must that needs be evil? We, it
seems, are critical; we are embarrassed with second thoughts; we cannot enjoy
any thing for hankering to know whereof the pleasure consists; we are lined with
eyes; we see with our feet; the time is infected with Hamlet’s unhappiness, --
“Sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought. Is it so bad then? Sight is
the last thing to be pitied. Would we be blind? Do we fear lest we should outsee
nature and God, and drink truth dry? I look upon the discontent of the literary
class, as a mere announcement of the fact, that they find themselves not in the
state of mind of their fathers, and regret the coming state as untried; as a boy
dreads the water before he has learned that he can swim. If there is any period
one would desire to be born in, -- is it not the age of Revolution; when the old
and the new stand side by side, and admit of being compared; when the energies
of all men are searched by fear and by hope; when the historic glories of the
old, can be compensated by the rich possibilities of the new era? This time,
like all times, is a very good one, if we but know what to do with it.
I
read with joy some of the auspicious signs of the coming days, as they glimmer
already through poetry and art, through philosophy and science, through church
and state.
One
of these signs is the fact, that the same movement which effected the elevation
of what was called the lowest class in the state, assumed in literature a very
marked and as benign an aspect. Instead of the sublime and beautiful; the near,
the low, the common, was explored and poetized. That, which had been negligently
trodden under foot by those who were harnessing and provisioning themselves for
long journeys into far countries, is suddenly found to be richer than all
foreign parts. The literature of the poor, the feelings of the child, the
philosophy of the street, the meaning of household life, are the topics of the
time. It is a great stride. It is a sign, -- is it not? of new vigor, when the
extremities are made active, when currents of warm life run into the hands and
the feet.
I
ask not for the great, the remote, the romantic; what is doing in Italy or
Arabia; what is Greek art, or Provencal minstrelsy; I embrace the common, I
explore and sit at the feet of the familiar, the low. Give me insight into
to-day, and you may have the antique and future worlds. What would we really
know the meaning of? The meal in the firkin; the milk in the pan; the ballad in
the street; the news of the boat; the glance of the eye; the form and the gait
of the body; -- show me the ultimate reason of these matters; show me the
sublime presence of the highest spiritual cause lurking, as always it does lurk,
in these suburbs and extremities of nature; let me see every trifle bristling
with the polarity that ranges it instantly on an eternal law; and the shop, the
plough, and the ledger, referred to the like cause by which light undulates and
poets sing; -- and the world lies no longer a dull miscellany and lumber-room,
but has form and order; there is no trifle; there is no puzzle; but one design
unites and animates the farthest pinnacle and the lowest trench. This idea has
inspired the genius of Goldsmith, Burns, Cowper, and, in a newer time, of
Goethe, Wordsworth, and Carlyle. This idea they have differently followed and
with various success. In contrast with their writing, the style of Pope, of
Johnson, of Gibbon, looks cold and pedantic. This writing is blood-warm. Man is
surprised to find that things near are not less beautiful and wondrous than
things remote. The near explains the far. The drop is a small ocean. A man is
related to all nature. This perception of the worth of the vulgar is fruitful in
discoveries. Goethe, in this very thing the most modern of the moderns, has
shown us, as none ever did, the genius of the ancients. There is one man of
genius, who has done much for this philosophy of life, whose literary value has
never yet been rightly estimated; -- I mean Emanuel Swedenborg. The most
imaginative of men, yet writing with the precision of a mathematician, he
endeavored to engraft a purely philosophical Ethics on the popular Christianity
of his time. Such an attempt, of course, must have difficulty, which no genius
could surmount. But he saw and showed the connection between nature and the
affections of the soul. He pierced the emblematic or spiritual character of the
visible, audible, tangible world. Especially
did his shade-loving muse hover over and interpret the lower parts of nature; he
showed the mysterious bond that allies moral evil to the foul material forms,
and has given in epical parables a theory of insanity, of beasts, of unclean and
fearful things.
Another
sign of our times, also marked by an analogous political movement, is, the new
importance given to the single person. Every thing that tends to insulate the
individual, -- to surround him with barriers of natural respect, so that each
man shall feel the world is his, and man shall treat with man as a sovereign
state with a sovereign state; -- tends to true union as well as greatness. “I
learned,” said the melancholy Pestalozzi, “that no man in God’s wide earth
is either willing or able to help any other man.” Help must come from the
bosom alone. The scholar is that man who must take up into himself all the
ability of the time, all the contributions of the past, all the hopes of the
future. He must be an university of knowledges. If there be one lesson more than
another, which should pierce his ear, it is, The world is nothing, the man is
all; in yourself is the law of all nature, and you know not yet how a globule of
sap ascends; in yourself slumbers the whole of Reason; it is for you to know
all, it is for you to dare all. Mr.
President and Gentlemen, this confidence in the unsearched might of man belongs,
by all motives, by all prophecy, by all preparation, to the American Scholar. We
have listened too long to the courtly muses of Europe. The spirit of the
American freeman is already suspected to be timid, imitative, tame. Public
and private avarice make the air we breathe thick and fat. The scholar is
decent, indolent, complaisant. See already the tragic consequence. The mind of
this country, taught to aim at low objects, eats upon itself. There is no work
for any but the decorous and the complaisant. Young men of the fairest promise,
who begin life upon our shores, inflated by the mountain winds, shined upon by
all the stars of God, find the earth below not in unison with these, -- but are
hindered from action by the disgust which the principles on which business is
managed inspire, and turn drudges, or die of disgust, -- some of them suicides.
What is the remedy? They did not yet see, and thousands of young men as hopeful
now crowding to the barriers for the career do not yet see, that, if the single
man plant himself indomitably on his instincts, and there abide, the huge world
will come round to him. Patience, -- patience; -- with the shades of all the
good and great for company; and for solace, the perspective of your own infinite
life; and for work, the study and the communication of principles, the making
those instincts prevalent, the conversion of the world. Is it not the chief
disgrace in the world, not to be an unit; -- not to be reckoned one character;
-- not to yield that peculiar fruit which each man was created to bear, but to
be reckoned in the gross, in the hundred, or the thousand, of the party, the
section, to which we belong; and our opinion predicted geographically, as the
north, or the south? Not so, brothers and friends, -- please God, ours shall not
be so. We will walk on our own feet; we will work with our own hands; we will
speak our own minds. The study of letters shall be no longer a name for pity,
for doubt, and for sensual indulgence. The dread of man and the love of man
shall be a wall of defence and a wreath of joy around all. A nation of men will
for the first time exist, because each believes himself inspired by the Divine
Soul which also inspires all men.